The importance of having the right information at the right time
It goes without saying that the ability for health officials to:
- obtain information on people suspected of having the new coronavirus;
- to require tests to be undertaken if that’s considered necessary; and
- if necessary, to quarantine people,
is vital to their ability to understand the prevalence and spread of the disease and to contain it.
This is why it was not surprising to learn yesterday that today (28 January 2020) Cabinet will decide whether to make the new coronavirus a notifiable infectious disease.
Before I’d heard of 2019-nCoV, I’d already summarised the relevant powers in the Health Act 1956 as part of the work I’m doing for StopLookGo Privacy. This is because the Health Act contains a range of significant provisions relating to the collection, use and sharing of personal/health information. Understanding these provisions made me realise why it’s important for the coronavirus to be classified as a notifiable infectious disease here. It’s important because that classification triggers a range of powers in the Act designed to help officials understand and control the spread of infectious diseases and mitigate risks to public health.
I thought it might be helpful to make the summaries of those provisions available to those who want to understand a little better why Cabinet’s decision today is important. So I’ve set them out below. They were not written with the coronavirus in mind.
Some definitions and how the coronavirus can be added to the Health Act as an infectious disease
Before we get to the provisions, it’s helpful to set out some definitions that appear in the provisions:
- an infectious disease is any disease specified in Part 1 or Part 2 of Schedule 1 (Infectious diseases) to the Act;
- a notifiable disease is any notifiable infectious disease, and any disease specified in Schedule 2 (Diseases notifiable to medical officer of health (other than notifiable infectious diseases));
- a notifiable infectious disease is any infectious disease specified in Part 1 of Schedule 1;
- a public health risk is a substantial risk of serious harm that 1 or more individuals who have, or may have, an infectious disease pose to the health or safety of 1 or more other persons because of the infectious disease, having regard to (a) the nature of the infectious disease, including its the transmissibility and mode of transmission; and (b) the relevant circumstances of the particular case; and
- a medical officer of health is the medical officer of health appointed under the Act for a health district, and includes any deputy medical officer of health; and, for the purposes of Part 4 (Quarantine), includes any medical practitioner acting under the direction of the medical officer of health.
We can expect to see the new coronavirus added to Part 1 (Notifiable infectious diseases) of Schedule 1 of the Health Act. Its cousins, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), are already there (they’re in Section B (Infectious diseases notifiable to medical officer of health) of Part 1).
Adding the disease to the Schedule is done by Order in Council. Primary legislation is not required. Section 3 of the Act enables the addition to Schedule 1 of the name or description of any disease by Order in Council.
The provisions
The key provisions in the Health Act are found in:
- Part 3 (Infectious and notifiable diseases);
- Part 3A (Management of infectious diseases); and
- Part 4 (Quarantine).
The summaries below of these Parts are focused on powers to collect, use and share personal information, as that was my focus when preparing them. The Parts contain other provisions and so anyone wanting the full detail would need to read these Parts of the Act in their entirety. For example, in my summary of Part 3A, I’ve not summarised provisions that deal with overarching principles set out in sections 92C to 92H that are to be taken into account by every person and every court performing a function under Part 3A (such as respect for individuals, informing individuals about what’s happening, and proportionality).
All this said, hopefully the summaries will help explain why it’s important for the new coronavirus to be classified as a notifiable infectious disease and why we can expect Cabinet to make the decision to do so.
Part 3 – Infectious and notifiable diseases
Legislative provisions | Health Act 1956, Part 3 (Infectious and notifiable diseases) |
Subject matter | Health – Infectious and notifiable diseases |
Agency or agencies | Medical practitioners, MOH, Other |
Summary | Part 3 of the Act (sections 70-92) deals with infectious and notifiable diseases. It contains a number of provisions that involve, either expressly or by implication, the collection, use or disclosure of personal information. They are summarised below.
Special powers of medical officer of health Under section 70 (Special powers of medical officer of health), for the purpose of preventing the outbreak or spread of any infectious disease, the medical officer of health may from time to time, if authorised to do so by the Minister or if a state of emergency has been declared under the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 or while an epidemic notice is in force, do a variety of things. The medical officer of health’s powers include the power to:
Health practitioners to give notice of cases of notifiable disease Under section 74 (Health practitioners to give notice of cases of notifiable disease), every health practitioner who has reason to believe that any person professionally attended by him or her is suffering from a notifiable disease or from any sickness of which the symptoms create a reasonable suspicion that it is a notifiable disease shall:
A health practitioner who gives notice of a notifiable disease must not disclose identifying information of the patient or deceased person if the disease is specified in section C of Part 1 of Schedule 1. (The diseases in that section are AIDS, gonorrhoeal infection, HIV and syphilis). A medical officer of health may, however, require a health practitioner to disclose identifying information of the patient or deceased person if disclosure of the identifying information is necessary to respond effectively to a public health risk. Medical laboratories to give notice of cases of notifiable disease Under section 74AA (Medical laboratories to give notice of cases of notifiable disease), the person in charge of a medical laboratory to whom test results of an actual or suspected notifiable disease are reported, or of which s/he becomes aware, must immediately tell the health practitioner for whom the test or other procedure concerned was undertaken, and the medical officer of health, of the infectious nature of the disease. S/he must not disclose identifying information of a person who is, or has been, or may be or may have been, infected with a disease specified in section C of Part 1 of Schedule 1 (described above). A medical officer of health may, however, require the person in charge of a medical laboratory to disclose identifying information of the person who is, or has been, or may be or may have been, infected with a disease if disclosure of the identifying information is necessary to respond effectively to a public health risk. Duty of occupier of premises as to infectious disease Under section 75 (Duty of occupier of premises as to infectious disease), when any person is suffering from any sickness of which the symptoms create a reasonable suspicion that it is a notifiable infectious disease, the occupier or other person in charge of the premises in which the first-mentioned person is living has a duty to consult a medical practitioner, or to notify the local authority of the district of the existence of a disease suspected to be a notifiable infectious disease. Duty of master of vessel in harbour as to infectious disease Under section 76 (Duty of master of vessel in harbour as to infectious disease), when any person on board a ship in any harbour is suffering from any sickness of which the symptoms create a reasonable suspicion that it is a notifiable infectious disease, the master of the ship has a duty to notify the medical officer of health of the existence of a disease suspected to be a notifiable infectious disease. Medical officer of health may enter premises Under section 77 (Medical officer of health may enter premises), the medical officer of health, or any medical practitioner authorised by the medical officer of health or by the local authority of the district:
|
Link to provisions | http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1956/0065/latest/DLM307082.html |
Notes | None |
Part 3A – Management of infectious diseases
Legislative provisions | Health Act 1956, Part 3A (Management of infectious diseases) |
Subject matter | Health – Management of infectious diseases |
Agency or agencies | Medical practitioners, MOH, Other |
Summary | Part 3A of the Act (sections 92A-92ZZH) deals with the management of infectious diseases. It contains a number of provisions that involve, either expressly or by implication, the collection, use or disclosure of personal information. They are summarised below.
Medical officer of health may give directions to individual posing public health risk Under section 92I (Medical officer of health may give directions to individual posing public health risk), if a medical officer of health believes on reasonable grounds that an individual poses a public health risk, the medical officer of health may give the individual a range of directions that s/he thinks are necessary to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual. If the disease that the individual is believed to have is not a notifiable infectious disease, every direction given to the individual must have the prior approval of the Director-General of Health. The directions the medical officer of health may give include directing the individual to:
If a direction requires an individual to refrain from carrying out a specified activity and a medical officer of health believes that the persons responsible for the activity need to be informed to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual, the medical officer of health may contact such persons and tell them about:
Despite anything in the Privacy Act, if a person requires another person to provide information under section 92I:
Medical officer of health may give directions to contacts of individuals posing public health risk Section 92J (Medical officer of health may give directions to contacts of individuals posing public health risk) applies if a medical officer of health believes on reasonable grounds that:
In that situation, the medical officer of health may give the individual certain directions that the medical officer of health thinks are necessary to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual. If the disease that the individual is believed to have is not a notifiable infectious disease, every direction given to the individual must have the prior approval of the Director-General of Health. The directions that may be given include directing the individual to:
If a direction requires an individual to refrain from carrying out a specified activity and a medical officer of health believes that the persons responsible for the activity need to be informed to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual, the medical officer of health may contact such persons and tell them about:
Despite anything in the Privacy Act, if a person requires another person to provide information under this section:
Direction for medical examination Section 92K (Direction for medical examination) applies if a medical officer of health believes on reasonable grounds that:
In that situation, the medical officer of health may direct the individual to undergo 1 or more medical examinations and may specify the places where those examinations are to be conducted and the health providers who are to conduct them. The medical officer of health may also direct the individual, until those examinations are completed, to do various things. Those things include:
If a direction requires an individual to refrain from carrying out a specified activity and a medical officer of health believes that the persons responsible for the activity need to be informed to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual, the medical officer of health may contact such persons and tell them about:
Despite anything in the Privacy Act, if a person requires another person to provide information under the section:
Confidentiality in relation to information provided or obtained under direction Section 92U (Confidentiality) states that, despite anything in the Privacy Act, information provided or obtained under a direction under Part 3A may not be used or disclosed by anyone except for the effective management of infectious diseases, but nothing in the section limits the right of an individual to access or disclose information about him or her under that Act or any other Act. District Court may make public health order Under section 92Z (District Court may make public health order), on an application by a medical officer of health, the District Court may make a public health order in respect of an individual if the court is satisfied that the individual poses a public health risk. Under section 92ZA (Public health order may impose certain requirements on individual), such an order may impose on an individual certain requirements the court thinks are necessary to prevent or minimise the public health risk posed by the individual. They can include requirement (among various others that are listed):
Medical examination orders Under section 92ZH (Medical examination orders), the District Court may, on the application of a medical officer of health, make a medical examination order in respect of an individual if the court is satisfied that:
Confidentiality in relation to information provided or obtained under public health orders Section 92ZS (Confidentiality) states that, despite anything in the Privacy Act, information provided or obtained under public health orders like this may not be used or disclosed by anyone except for the effective management of infectious diseases, but nothing in the section limits the right of an individual to access or disclose information about him or her under that Act or any other Act. Contact tracing Subpart 5 of Part 3A deals with ‘contact tracing’, the purpose of which is to obtain information about the contacts of persons with infectious diseases or suspected of having infectious diseases, to:
The contract tracing provisions are detailed. Only certain aspects are summarised here. Section 92ZZ explains that contact tracing, in respect of an individual with an infectious disease or suspected of having an infectious disease, involves:
The contract tracer may be a medical officer of health, a health protection officer, or a person suitably qualified in health or community work who is nominated to undertake contact tracing by a district health board or medical officer of health (section 92ZZA). Under section 92ZZC, the contact tracer may require an individual with an infectious disease or suspected of having an infectious disease to give the contact tracer information about the circumstances in which the infectious disease may have been transmitted to, or by, the individual. In addition, an individual with an infectious disease or suspected of having an infectious disease must, if required by the contact tracer, provide information about:
Under section 92ZZF, for the purpose of identifying the contacts of an individual who has been given a direction under section 92ZZC, a contact tracer may approach certain persons and require them to provide the contact tracer with the names and addresses of the contacts of the individual that are known to the person. The certain person are:
These persons must provide information in response to a request despite anything in the Privacy Act. Despite anything in the Privacy Act, if a person requires another person to provide information under section 92ZZF:
Under section 92ZZG (Duty of confidentiality), a contact tracer who approaches a contact or approaches a person under section 92ZZF must not, as far as practicable, disclose to the contact or that other person the identity of the individual who may have:
Despite anything in the Privacy Act 1993, information provided or obtained by a contact tracer may not be used or disclosed by anyone except for the effective management of infectious diseases, but nothing in the section limits the right of an individual to access or disclose information about him or her under that Act or any other Act. |
Link to provisions | http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1956/0065/latest/DLM307296.html |
Notes | None |
Part 4 – Quarantine
Legislative provisions | Health Act 1956, Part 4 (Quarantine) |
Subject matter | Health – Quarantine |
Agency or agencies | Medical practitioners, MOH |
Summary | Part 4 of the Act (sections 94-112AA) deals with quarantine. It contains a number of provisions that involve, either expressly or by implication, the collection, use or disclosure of personal information. They are summarised below.
Who is ‘liable to quarantine’? Section 96 prescribes the ships and aircraft that are liable to quarantine. For example, except as stated otherwise in regulations, ships arriving in New Zealand from any port beyond New Zealand, and aircraft arriving in New Zealand from any place beyond New Zealand, are liable to quarantine. Under section 97(1), a person is liable to quarantine if he or she is on board, or disembarks from, a craft (e.g., a ship or aircraft) that is liable to quarantine. Some additional powers in later provisions (sections 97D and 97E) apply in relation to a person liable to quarantine when section 97(2) applies to the person. Section 97(2) applies to a person liable to quarantine if the medical officer of health believes or suspects, on reasonable grounds:
“Quarantinable diseases” are diseases stated in Part 3 of Schedule 1. At present they include, for example, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Obligations of people liable to quarantine Section 97A imposes requirements on people who are liable to quarantine to comply with directions and supply information. Under the section, a person who is liable to quarantine:
In the case of people arriving in New Zealand by craft, the medical officer of health or a person authorised by the medical officer of health may request information by requiring the person appearing to the officer to be in charge of the craft to collect or supply some or all of it. The information that may be requested from a person includes:
The medical officer of health or a person authorised by the medical officer of health may also obtain from the department of State responsible for keeping it (and the department may supply to the medical officer of health or a health protection officer) any information about a person who is liable to quarantine that the officer believes on reasonable grounds to be necessary to obtain in order to trace the person’s movements or discover the contacts the person has had with other people. Powers and duties of medical officer of health or health protection officer in relation to quarantinable diseases Under section 97D (Powers and duties of medical officer of health or health protection officer in relation to quarantinable diseases), if a craft arrives in New Zealand carrying a person to whom section 97(2) applies (as described above), the medical officer of health or a health protection officer may, among other things:
Surveillance of certain people liable to quarantine Under section 97E (Surveillance of certain people liable to quarantine), a person to whom section 97(2) applies (as described above), or who is liable to quarantine and has been quarantined under section 70(1)(f), must give to the medical officer of health all information reasonably required to enable the management of risks to public health. The medical officer of health or a health protection officer may also cause such a person:
Before being placed under surveillance at large, a person must give an undertaking, in a form prescribed by regulations made under the Act, that he or she will report to the medical officer of health or a medical practitioner at the times and places required. While kept under surveillance at large, a person must:
Children and people under disability Under section 97F (Children and people under disability), every person who has the custody or charge of a child or the role of providing day-to-day care for a child, or has charge of a person who is under disability:
Inspection of ships and ships’ declarations of health Sections 101 and 102 address, respectively:
Persons on board ships or aircraft suffering from quarantinable disease Under section 108 (Persons suffering from quarantinable disease), if any person on board any ship, or arriving by any aircraft:
the medical officer of health or health protection officer may do all such things and give all such directions in respect of that person as may be prescribed by regulations made under the Act. Power to board any ship and inspect Under section 111 (Power to board any ship and inspect), the medical officer of health or health protection officer or any officer of the Ministry of Health, or any person acting under their authority, may board any ship in any port. They may enter and inspect any part of the ship and may inspect, among other things, the passenger list. Where the medical officer of health boards any ship under this section s/he may require any person on board the ship who may be suffering from any infectious disease to submit to any prescribed examination. |
Link to provisions | http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1956/0065/latest/DLM307456.html |
Notes | None |
Get a PDF copy